Editorial Policy

Editorial Policy

The Editorial Standards Behind Every US Water Department Entry

This page sets out the editorial framework we work to: who writes our content, how we source it across federal, state, and local layers, how we verify department directors and governing bodies, how we handle corrections, what advertising relationships we accept and decline, and how we handle AI assistance. Read it alongside our Sources & Methodology.

Effective date: January 1, 2026
Last reviewed: April 2026
Standard: Manual verification, quarterly cycle

1. Editorial Mission

US water departments are local, varied, and (for governmental departments) public bodies that exist to serve residents. There are roughly 50,000 public water systems in the United States, plus regional authorities, PUDs, rural cooperatives, and investor-owned utilities. Each has its own director, governing body, public meeting schedule, customer service hours, and emergency line. We exist to give US residents, ratepayers, voters, journalists, and policy researchers plain-English access to each department’s structure, governance, and engagement routes — without auto-scraped staleness, without misleading branding, and without any confusion between department directory information and FCRA-style consumer-report information.

2. Source Hierarchy

We work to a six-tier source hierarchy, where higher-tier sources govern when sources conflict:

  • Tier 1 — Primary authority: The water department’s own published website, including the customer service page, leadership / staff directory, governance / board page, public-meeting calendar, and CCR page.
  • Tier 2 — Parent jurisdiction: The parent city, county, or special district’s published organizational chart, municipal code, and (for elected commissions) the public-elections office that administers PUD or cooperative elections.
  • Tier 3 — EPA SDWIS and state primacy agency: The EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) for the PWS ID and the state primacy agency for SDWA enforcement details and CCR archives.
  • Tier 4 — State PUC / PSC: For investor-owned utilities, the state Public Utility Commission or Public Service Commission docket page for the current rate case and tariff schedule.
  • Tier 5 — Industry associations: AWWA (American Water Works Association), NACWA (National Association of Clean Water Agencies), NRWA (National Rural Water Association), ASDWA (Association of State Drinking Water Administrators) — for industry-standard procedures and definitions.
  • Tier 6 — Billing-vendor documentation: Vendor docs from Tyler MUNIS, Cayenta, InvoiceCloud, Paymentus, Harris ERP, CIS Infinity, and similar — useful only for understanding the portal vendor a department uses, never authoritative for the department’s own information.

Full detail on each tier is on our Sources & Methodology page.

3. Verification Workflow

  1. Identify the right authoritative source. The department’s own website, parent jurisdiction’s organizational chart, EPA SDWIS, state primacy agency, state PUC docket.
  2. Verify URLs are live. A human editor clicks every link before publication, including department main page and CCR.
  3. Cross-check the office address against USPS data and the department’s own contact page.
  4. Verify the governing body attribution. Against the parent city or county’s published organizational chart or municipal code; for PUDs, against the state-required posted meeting notices.
  5. Verify the director / general manager. Department directors are typically appointed (municipal) or hired (PUDs / cooperatives / IOUs). We verify against the parent jurisdiction’s published org chart or the department’s “About” / “Leadership” page.
  6. Verify the public-meeting schedule against the local government’s published meeting calendar; verify the state Open Meetings / Sunshine Act notice-posting requirements are being met.
  7. Dial-test the customer service and emergency lines. Quarterly cycle. We confirm the line answers and routes correctly — without generating any false emergency call.
  8. Editor sign-off. A second editor reviews end-to-end, including a fresh check on the “this is not the department” notice, the 911 / Poison Control framework, and the FCRA non-CRA disclosure.

4. Sunshine-Law Emphasis — What Makes This Site Distinct

State open-records and Open Meetings laws are central to our editorial mission

waterdepartmentguide.org/ emphasizes the public-body nature of municipal water departments and special-district utilities. We describe each department's public-meeting schedule (where applicable), agenda-and-minutes archive, and state open-records request route. We work to the specific state open-records statute (California Public Records Act, Texas Public Information Act, Florida Sunshine Law, New York FOIL, Washington RCW 42.56, Illinois FOIA, Pennsylvania Right-to-Know Law, Ohio R.C. 149.43, and the parallel frameworks in every state). We work to the specific state Open Meetings Act (California Ralph M. Brown Act, Texas Open Meetings Act, Florida Government in the Sunshine Act, New York Open Meetings Law, Washington RCW 42.30, Illinois 5 ILCS 120, Pennsylvania Sunshine Act, Ohio R.C. 121.22, and parallel frameworks). The federal Freedom of Information Act (FOIA, 5 U.S.C. ยง 552) applies to federal records (e.g., EPA records), not to state and local water-department records.

5. Independence

waterdepartmentguide.org/ is independent. We are not affiliated with the EPA, any state primacy agency, any state Public Utility Commission, AWWA, NACWA, NRWA, ASDWA, the CFPB, the FTC, any specific water department, any water-utility holding company (American Water, Essential Utilities, Aqua, SJW, California Water Service, etc.), or any billing-technology vendor. No regulator, department, or vendor reviews our content prior to publication. No payment is accepted for editorial coverage of any specific department.

6. Advertising Relationships

We are funded by display advertising. Our editorial content is never altered to favor any advertiser. We decline advertising in these categories:

  • “Lookup” services that misrepresent themselves as offering FCRA-compliant tenant screening, utility-deposit decisions, or credit decisions to consumers or landlords
  • Operations that misrepresent themselves as the EPA, a state primacy agency, a state PUC, or a specific department
  • Unregulated bill-payment services with hidden fees or aggressive collection terms
  • Predatory utility-deposit financing
  • Predatory home-warranty schemes targeting utility-system repairs
  • Predatory water-quality testing schemes that misrepresent EPA action thresholds
  • Water-filtration vendors that misrepresent CCR data or EPA standards
  • Gambling, payday lending, adult content, or other categories incompatible with our public-utility-information context

7. We Do Not Publish FCRA-Style Information

Our editorial content does not include FCRA-style content

We do not publish account numbers, payment histories, collection records, deposit records, account holders’ names, or any other account-level information about identifiable individuals. We do not solicit such information from departments or from any other source. We do not aggregate utility account histories. Our content is administrative directory and governance information about departments — office address, director, governing body, public meeting schedule, regulator, CCR, rate structure. This editorial choice keeps us cleanly outside the definition of a Consumer Reporting Agency under FCRA § 603(f), 15 U.S.C. § 1681a(f), and outside the obligations of a furnisher under FCRA § 623, 15 U.S.C. § 1681s-2.

8. Corrections

If a directory entry is wrong — director change, council/commission election results, billing-portal vendor changed, customer service phone number changed, public-meeting schedule changed, CCR publication URL changed — we want to know and we want to fix it. Reader-reported corrections are our priority queue. We process corrections within 7 business days, with a 48-hour expedited path for broken department URLs and out-of-date emergency phone numbers. We add a small editorial note when a substantive correction is made.

9. Authors and Contributors

Site content is written and reviewed by editors who have spent time researching and writing about US water utility regulation, the SDWA framework, state open-records and sunshine laws, and public-body governance. Specialist subject-matter reviewers — including AWWA-affiliated water professionals, retired municipal public-works directors, and open-government practitioners — are consulted on substantive editorial questions, particularly after major federal rule changes (EPA’s PFAS rule of April 2024, LCRR / LCRI updates, CCR Rule revisions).

10. AI and Automation

We use software tools for spell-check, grammar review, and routine drafting assistance. However, no editorial fact, URL, telephone number, director name, governing-body attribution, regulator attribution, address, or public-meeting schedule on waterdepartmentguide.org/ is published from AI without human verification against the department's own published page or the parent jurisdiction's organizational chart. Every department entry passes through human editorial review. We do not auto-generate or auto-publish department entries. We do not use AI to generate FCRA-style content, which we do not publish at all.

11. Contact

For corrections, editorial questions, or sourcing inquiries: info@waterdepartmentguide.org

Spotted a Correction?

Email us with subject line “Correction” — corrections are our priority queue, 7 business days, 48-hour expedited path for broken department URLs and out-of-date emergency phone numbers.

📧 info@waterdepartmentguide.org